Its supposed to be cold here this week and I really don't like that. So I was going through my files and found this shot taken last May of ripening wheat.
Photographs and commentary posted by Ed, whenever he feels like it. which is infrequently. Ed was raised on a farm in Monroe County, Illinois, graduated from Valmeyer High School. B.S. Journalism, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. A.A.S. Funeral Service Education, St. Louis Community College; licensed Missouri and Illinois Funeral Director and Embalmer; Licensed Fisherman, Licensed Driver, Licensed Married Person and Missouri Notary Public. (My Commission Expires July 17, 2017)
Monday, December 31, 2007
Saturday, December 29, 2007
Thursday, December 27, 2007
A cow egg
I showed this shot to a coworker and she said it is a cow egg that will hatch next spring. And I thought it was a round hay bale enveloped in fog on a windswept Iowa field.
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
What I did over Christmas vacation
My wife and I spent Christmas with her parents in Oskaloosa, Iowa, a sleepy farm town (population 11,000) 49 miles southeast of DesMoines.
On Dec. 22 there was last minute Christmas shopping and my mother-in-law was finishing the last minute preparations for our big family gathering that afternoon. I, however, didn't have anything on my schedule and I read in the morning paper that Barack Obama would be making a stump speech at the Oskaloosa Middle School at 9 a.m. Sounded a good thing for a political junkie to do on his vacation so I grabbed my camera and went.
It was an interesting experience all around. And I talked my way into the press area (I knew that battery grip on my XTi was good for something), and probably got as good a picture as any of the working press. In fact, my shot looks very similar to the one that ran in the DesMoines Register the next day. The local newspaper, the Oskaloosa Herald, apparantly couldn't send a photographer. While they had a good write up they used a stock shot of the canditate. Had I known they needed a good picture I wouldn't let them use one of mine.
Tuesday, December 18, 2007
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
Red Meat
I feel sorry for vegetarians, especially during the season of Christmas office parties and home entertaining. It was 100 percent corn-fed, 21-day aged prim filet, cooked to perfection. You could almost cut it with a fork. And it was delicious.
Monday, December 10, 2007
Photoshop Fun
This is one of my first attepts at selective colorization. Or is it selective black & white?
Thursday, December 06, 2007
Illinois Farm Bureau Photo Rights Grab
Farm Bureau members who are amateur photographers whould beware of the fine print in the rules of the Illinois Farm Bureau's photo contest. (When you get to that site click on the cow picture for a PDF of the full contest rules)
The fine print in the entry rules contains the following provision:
"By submitting a photo, you authorize the Illinois Agricultural Association, more commonly known as Illinois Farm Bureau, to use your photograph for purposes of promoting the photo contest and other activities. You waive any claim of ownership or right to compensation for use of the photo."
WHAT????
Simply put, if an amateur photographer farm wife or farm husband enters picture of daughter Susie posing with her county fair grand champion Holstein, that picture becomes the all out property of the Illinois Farm Bureau and it can use the picture any way it wants. To any amateur photographer this would be flattering. What's puzzling is why the Illinois Farm Bureau feels the need to claim all rights -- the copyright -- without just compensation to the original copyright owner?
Stock Photography is a multi-million (at the very, very least) industry in the U.S. Formerly the bastion of hardcore weekend shooters and professional photographers, the proliferation of the Internet and photo sharing sites like Flickr have made photography accessible to the masses.
To the chagrin of legions of pro shooters a great number of these masses are darned good shooters who could care less about making a buck or two from photography, though more and more amateur shooters are wising up. Like me. I'm no New York shooter but I've learned over the last two or three recent years that publishers are willing to pay to license pictures. To the chagin of legions of pro shooters some amateurs don't realize that their photos are valuable to someone who needs that particular photo.
To the delight to large publishers, such as the Illinois Farm Bureau, these organizations take advantage of uninformed amateur photographers and devise photo rights grabs under the guise of "photo contests." The Illinois Farm Bureau isn't the first nor last organization to use this ploy. But I for one am calling foul on this one.
Photo contests are great, especially one that really do highlight the picture documentation of modern rural lifestyles. The Illinois Farm Bureau if it so choses can administer this contest without confiscating all rights of the entrants.
I
Sunday, November 25, 2007
Friday, November 23, 2007
Thanksgiving Cat
I had hoped to take a picture of yesterday's Turkey coming out of the oven but I didn't get around to it. This is one of the almost 100 pictures I took of my niece's cat so she could use a photo for her christmas card.
Another hunting pose
I wasn't going to post this one because I thought it was overexposed. Then I worked with it a little bit in photoshop and decided I have a halfway decent picture.
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Its Hunting Season
My nephew, left, and his hunting buddy, right, took time out from their deer hunting today to pose for an environmental portrait. So far they haven't had any luck bagging a deer, but its only Saturday.
Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Autumn Bluffs
How's this for a colorful magazine cover shot? The only thing that bothers me is the junk trucks in front of the red barn. Others in the office say that the trucks make the picture interesting, and "real."
Monday, November 12, 2007
Corn picker in the weeds
This is another from Saturdays shots on the farm. Its an old two-row ear corn picker. When I was a youngster I remember my Dad using it. It has seen better days.
The purpose of this post is to also test the Flickr.com blog feature. Hopefully this'll make posting updates less of a chore.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
On a roll

Up and running again
Under which day does this fall? Oh well, I've lost track. FINALLY this morning I found some halfway interesting stuff to photograph. Whenever on of my Dad's vintage John Deere tractors is outside I always snap a quick portrait. This morning both my father and cousin happened to be in the vicinity and I had my lights set up. For those who are interested in these things, it was shot at ISO 100, f7.1/ 200. I had a bare SB24 and SB26 on either side of the scene at full power. This will be a classic to add to our family photo album. Tuesday, November 06, 2007
I haven't forgotten about my blog
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
On the road again
Monday, October 22, 2007
The Toy Tractor

Sunday, October 21, 2007

Thursday, October 18, 2007
Top of the muffin to you
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Monday, October 15, 2007
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Back in Business
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Check back on October 15
Friday, October 05, 2007
Nothing to show
Thursday, October 04, 2007
On the campaign trail
However, this is not a political blog, and yes, I will shut up and take pictures in the same manner the Dixie Chicks should shut up and sing.
Wednesday, October 03, 2007
No wonder my sinuses are stuffed
Tuesday, October 02, 2007
Monday, October 01, 2007
Sunday, September 30, 2007
Don't try this at home

The truck again
Friday, September 28, 2007
Not quite full moon

Thursday, September 27, 2007
Wednesday, September 26, 2007
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Kitchen table photography
Monday, September 24, 2007
Back to the truck
Sunday, September 23, 2007
Safe at second base
Saturday, September 22, 2007
Making progress

Friday, September 21, 2007
A dog and a birthday cake
DAY 36: It's a good thing I don't blog about the media, or else I'd burn up a lot of pixels here railing against Dan Rather and his excuses benind a $70 million lawsuit against his former employer. Don't get me started.
Instead I will comment on today's tripple post. Today I had the opportunity to make a very quick shot of an office birthday cake. The room was well lit but by playing with exposure and flash intensity I was able to isolate the cake. Sure, it could've been repositioned and the camera angle could've been better, but it is an interesting study.
As for the other two shots of stepdog I figured out that getting down on dog's perspective helped immensely. This time I put my Speedlite 430EX on the end of my monopod and connected it to the camera with a hotshoe cord, or whatever you cal it. By varying the intensity and position of the bare flash I was able to get good results from these early experiments. More to come, I'm sure.
Thursday, September 20, 2007
Eperimenting with off camera flash

Wednesday, September 19, 2007
Pickles revisited

Tuesday, September 18, 2007
A snoozer

Sincerely.....Ed
I read your blogspot, and obviously you are not exactly sure what you are talking about. I am willing to pay a fair price for what I get. I feel that most of the professional photographers I have come across in the St. Louis area are not as good as they like to think they are. Their images are grainy, not very clear and just not as good as I would hope. They seem to be not using a very good camera.I am willing to pay someone what they are worth, just not so happy with my options at this current time. Trying to find someone who is independent and more artistic. Who can make a picture look like art and not just take a picture like my grandmother could, but take a picture like an actual photographer. I am not just about going cheap, I am
trying to find someone different and with unique traits that I have not been
able to find with my so-called professional options. Sure, I have found some
great photographers too, but I cannot afford them. I am looking for a middle
ground. I cannot afford the best quality pictures, just not possible, so I am
looking for someone who can do pretty good pictures at a little less then what
the great photographers charge. I have yet to find a middle ground until I
turned to craigslist. I either found exceptional photographers that I would
love, but cannot afford. Or terrible photographers that still charge too much for their terrible quality.
So far, I have had a nice response. I found a student photographer who takes wonderful pictures at a fair price, not cheap by any means. I am looking into the rest of my options as of now and came across at least one other that I would be comfortable using. I
haven't been able to check out all of them yet, I recieved far too many replies.
All of which have been reasonable in price.
I have recieved many replies, I would say in the 15-20 range and most of them have been better then I would have thought. Some are not, but that is the chance I take when putting an ad on craigslist. Thr prices are fair, unlike some photographers who claim to be professionals charge.
So just because I do not want to pay $1500 for someone who uses a camera that outputs pictures very similar to what I could take with my Kodak Easy Share, does not mean I am not willing to pay a fair price for their work.
Well said! (And congratulations on your upcoming big day)
Monday, September 17, 2007
Sunday commentary leftovers
And then there's this gem from the St. Louis version of craigslist. The bride is looking for a wedding shooter -- a newbie or student okay -- to shoot all day at three location and in return turn over a CD of the images and all rights for a "price to be determined." I emailed this bride and ask her how many photographers jumped at this opportunity. Even if I never hear back from her I fear this uninformed bride will find an uninformed photographer who will actually be dumb enough to take on this job on her terms. Again, if you're good enough to shoot the kind of shots she specifically describes in her ad then you're good enough to charge a fair price for them. And she should be willing to pay for quality work.
The tractor cruise

Sunday, September 16, 2007
The Sunday paper


Sunday commentary
After a month this blog is doing for me what I intended. I'm getting out more trying to take purposeful and interesting pictures. It is rather subjective to conclude that I've done that but I think I have.
I've also been reading more about photography, especially the business of photography including magazine, book and newspaper publishing, studio and wedding photography, and stock photography. One question that kept popping up in my mind while doing all that reading is: "What kind of photographer am I."
Well, a pretty good one, if I might say so myself. Last year revenue from my assignment and stock sales paid for five day cruise to Mexico. That may sound impressive until you consider that cruises these days are cheap if you know the right time to book. What I'm trying to say is that I sell -- excuse me-- I LICENSE a picture or two a year and my health or livlihood hardly depend on photo license income. However, I truly believe that if I had to, as in had no other choice, and if I really hustled and worked the phone and took lots of pictures I might be able to eek out a very, very modest living as a photographer.
So, when I license a photo I try to get as much money as buyer is willing to pay. I might not be a well known photographer and I might not be a fulltime photographer but if I have a picture a buyer is willing to pay for I want to get the same amount of money as that buyer would pay to the "more professional" photographer.
The consensus among the professional photographers writing on the subjet is that digital photography and the internet has made it possible for any putz with a camera to get in on the action. Many of these so called putzs post their photos on microstock sites such as istockphoto and sell what is called royalty-free photography for rock bottom prices. I would go so far as to call it the Wal-Martization of stock photography, only worse.
And don't get me started on those folks on craigslist looking for a wedding photographer willing to shoot a wedding and then turn over a CD of images for $250 or $300, if that much. What's worse is the putzes who take these jobs. Some of these discount shooters might be good. If they're that good, they should be getting more for their work. If they end up shooting crappy photos then the bride and bridegroom got what they paid for. Crap.
The system will weed out this new breed of crappy photographers because it simply isn't true that any putz with a digital camera can shoot good pictures. What we really have to worry about is these photographers who do shoot decent photos and give them away. Stop selling yourself short. It depresses prices across the board and if you're a good photographer just starting out it just doesn't help you to give away your services at discout prices. If you shoot like a pro then you should charge like a pro. People will still pay for good photography.
Saturday, September 15, 2007
Now that's a yawn
































